schaut mal die neueren von johnny an (glaube sie sind von ungarn). rücken hat sich meiner ansicht nach stark verbessert und die brust ist einfach nur brutal.
gruss
Kid-Ping
Druckbare Version
schaut mal die neueren von johnny an (glaube sie sind von ungarn). rücken hat sich meiner ansicht nach stark verbessert und die brust ist einfach nur brutal.
gruss
Kid-Ping
sein rücken war und ist echt ne wucht, ansonsten hat johnny ne super thikness!
;)Zitat:
Zitat von Das Schwäbische Grauen
DSG
pix
auf dem bild ist er nicht viel schlechter als levrone(in best form)
Also ich finde Johnny geil!
Kommt auch ausn Kraftsport.
Wegen dem hals das war doch nicht ernst gemeint oder?
Alle Massigeren BB haben kein hals mehr...;-)
Johnnie Jackson hat sich seit dem Mr. Olympia 2003 wirklich enorm verbessert. Zum Vergleich ein Bild von vor einem Jahr!
Kid-Ping hat Recht. Sogar relaxed ist Johnnie's Brust kaum zu übertreffen.Zitat:
Zitat von Kid-Ping
Insbesondere die Brust, als auch der Rücken sind "super-thick", und es scheint von mal zu mal mehr zu werden......
So wie es sich für einen echten Olympian gehört, kennt Jackson "no limits". Statt von einem bekannten Namen zu leben, packt er immer noch mehr drauf.
Her ist der komplette Bericht, leider auf englisch :
2004 OLYMPIA SPECIAL
Mr. Olympia Special! - Revolution
Bodybuilding's premier event undergoes a sensational facelift
Suspense. Remember that word.
The first Mr. Olympia I ever saw live was the 18th rendition: the 1982 event in London. At the end of the evening, the top six - Chris Dickerson, Frank Zane, Casey Viator, Samir Bannout, Albert Beckles and Tom Platz - came out. Together, they went through the mandatory poses, then broke into a free-for-all posedown and, when that was complete, they stood in line to hear the placings announced from six on up.
The last Olympia I have thus far seen (I'm no H.G. Wells) was the 39th rendition: the 2003 event in Las Vegas. At the end of the evening, the top six - Ronnie Coleman, Jay Cutler, Dexter Jackson, Dennis James, Günter Schlierkamp and Kevin Levrone - came out. Together they went through the mandatory poses, then broke into a free-for-all posedown and, when that was complete, they stood in line to hear the placings announced from six on up. Have you ever seen the movie Groundhog Day?
Twenty-one Olympias took place between 1982 and 2003 and the script, save for the names of the participants, was unchanged.
Kick in the fact that since 1984 only three men - Lee Haney, Dorian Yates and Ronnie Coleman - have been crowned Mr. Olympia, and the cold reality is that the format to judge the best-built man on the planet has become as repetitive as Courtney Love's meltdowns.
As Alfred Hitchcock (now there's a guy who knew Vertigo and where not to go) would be the first to tell you, the element missing is Suspense, old boy.
It's not the Olympia competitors' faults - they come loaded for bear of the Sandow variety year after year. It's the format of the contest that requires an overhaul. Suspense, excitement, audience interaction and razzmatazz befitting its Las Vegas locale need to be added to the Mr. Olympia contest. And that's exactly what's going to happen at this year's event on October 30 at Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino. For bodybuilding's grand old man, a facelift and fresh life will begin at 40. Here's a rundown of how the Mr. Olympia contest will be renovated and how history will be made on October 30.
NEW JUDGING FORMAT
1) New Mandatory Pose The most-muscular pose (the competitors' favorite version) will be introduced as an eighth mandatory pose. It will be the eighth and final pose of the mandatories.
2) Prejudging Up to now, prejudging has commenced with the complete lineup coming onstage and then going into symmetry comparisons. This has not given the judges sufficient time to see who is in shape or not and, as a consequence, they have tended to call "name" bodybuilders for the first comparisons. So that the judges are allowed sufficient time to assess the athletes and to diminish the chances of any bodybuilder being overlooked, the following procedure will be introduced at the 2004 Mr. Olympia. The prejudging will commence with each athlete appearing individually, in number order, to complete the eight mandatory poses.
This means that right at the beginning of the event, each athlete gets 90 seconds or so on his own to impress the judges. If a "name" guy is out of shape, the judges will see that from the get-go and, vice versa, if a lesser-known guy is on the money, he has a greater opportunity to come into the reckoning earlier.
A few minutes after the last competitor completes his individual mandatory poses, the whole lineup will return to the stage for Round 1, the symmetry round. The competitors will be called out in groups of five or less for symmetry comparisons. When the judges have viewed the final comparison, the lineup leaves the stage.
Then, after another few minutes, the competitors return to the stage for Round 2, the mandatory (muscularity) round. The competitors will be called out in groups of five or less for muscularity comparisons. When the judges have viewed the final comparison, the lineup leaves the stage and the prejudging session is over.
DAYS OF WHINE AND POSES
Posing Round At the commencement of the evening finals, a giant digital scoreboard will be onstage. As each competitor comes out to do his posing routine, his scores from the afternoon will be announced and then flashed onto the scoreboard. As the athletes continue to pose, the audience will be able to track how each athlete is doing and witness the progress of the contest in real time. Previously, audience members had to wait until the evening's end to learn who finished where. Under this system, they can track the contest as it happens and vent their approval or otherwise.
After the posing round, the athletes will be brought back onstage and their posing round scores will be given and shown on the scoreboard. In a tight contest, placings will change either at the top or further down, and the audience and athletes will be able to witness these changes as they happen. Imagine the commotion if this procedure had been in force for the 2001 contest, when Jay Cutler won the two prejudging rounds in the afternoon, and then defending champ Ronnie Coleman came from behind to win the final two rounds. Instead of wondering whether the champion's crown was in jeopardy or not (as they did in 2001), the fans would have been fully cognizant of the situation at the start of the evening and then thrilled to the spectacle of Coleman's late charge to win the contest by a whisker.
After the posing scores have been shown, the top 10 will be announced and then that group will be whittled down to the final six. At that point, it will get really interesting with an innovation that constitutes the most radical change in the history of bodybuilding contests: the Challenge Round.
THE CHALLENGE ROUND
As the final six remain onstage, the scoreboard will show their standings. Rather than displaying the accumulated scores from the previous three rounds, though, the scoring will be completely revamped. The first-placed athlete will be assigned six points, the second five points, and so on down to the sixth-placed athlete who will be awarded one point. If this new system had been part of last year's contest, the scoring would have stood as follows.
Ronnie Coleman 6 points
Jay Cutler 5 points
Dexter Jackson 4 points
Dennis James 3 points
Günter Schlierkamp 2 points
Kevin Levrone 1 point
Here, the contest starts all over again. The first three rounds are used to determine the top six athletes who qualify for the Challenge Round and their pecking order. Now, the athletes are out to get extra points and (unlike the present situation, where the guy with the lowest points is the winner) the athlete with the most points at the end of the Challenge Round will win. This will take bodybuilding into a combative mano-a-mano arena never before seen.
a) Head to Head Each competitor, starting with the sixth-placed athlete, calls one individual pose of his choice against the other finalists. Each one of those poses counts as two points going to the winner of the pose, which is added to his placing. Using last year's contest as the example, Levrone (sixth) would call a pose against Schlierkamp (fifth), then James (fourth) and so on up to Coleman (first). Then Schlierkamp would call five poses, starting with Levrone and working up; then it would be James' turn, and so on until the contest climaxed with Coleman calling five poses.
Here's where the excitement mounts. The 11 judges will be holding electronic devices that connect them to the scoreboard and, as each pose is completed, they will press the devices and their decision will be flashed onto the scoreboard. For example, if the Levrone versus James face-off split the judges 7 to 4 in favor of Levrone, that result would be shown on the scoreboard, and two points would be added to Levrone's total. The audience will watch all this and be able to voice their accord or disagreement with the results of each posing challenge.
b) Strategy One caveat is that an athlete can call a particular pose only twice. For example, Levrone's strongest pose is probably the hand-clasped most-muscular, but he would be able to use it only twice. This is where strategy comes in. Would Levrone use his strongest pose against the lower-placed athletes or save it for the top two guys in pursuit of points? It would be a case of an athlete assessing the weaknesses of the other guys, then deciding which pose would cause the greatest damage to each of his rivals.
The system will give all six finalists the chance to go against each other and will result in the scoreboard showing different leaders at various times. For instance, if Levrone won four of his five poses and the only one he lost was against Jackson, then his score of eight points for his challenges would be added to his score going into that round, for a total of nine, putting him in the lead. As the contest progresses, an athlete in the lead might be caught and surpassed, but an ever-changing scoreboard would bring unprecedented drama to the event.
If this procedure had been in effect at the 2001 Olympia, the whole contest could have come down to the final pose between Coleman and Cutler. Can you imagine the excitement and frenzy of the audience watching a Sandow being decided by one head-to-head devil-take-the-hindmost pose? If the system had been in force in 2002, then a late-charging Schlierkamp might have climbed to third or second instead of placing fifth.
Whatever the permutations, the bottom line is that as the contest winds it way to its climax, the audience will see, via the scoreboard, the precise point at which the eventual champion takes an unassailable lead. The fans will see the snapshot moment, as it were, when he crossed the finishing line.
AT THE END OF THE DAY
The new scoring system will have its critics, but the presentation of the Mr. Olympia contest has to be galvanized and excitement and audience interaction increased. The champion will still be the guy with the best physique: No one can win by default. But the determination of the event will be much more spectator friendly and dramatic. Audience members will be fully aware of how the contest is unfolding as they witness placings and fortunes change, just as they would if they were courtside at a Los Angeles Lakers game. Such entertainment and involvement is only right for die-hard fans who spend hundreds of dollars on event tickets and hotel and travel charges. We have to make the contest compelling for its supporters;
they deserve that consideration.
This year's contest will be transitional. If there are glitches, they will be ironed out and tweaked for future use. For the time being, the Challenge Round will take place only at the Mr. Olympia contest. Whatever the outcome of this year's contest, October 30, 2004, will be a red-letter day in the history of the sport as it experiences the most revolutionary innovation since the inception of the Mr. Olympia itself in 1965.
Gruß,
Arnold