Da spiele ich auf die Insulinwirkung von hochglykämischen Carbs nach dem Training und deren anabole oder besser gesagt antikatabole Komponente an.
Ist mir schon klar, auf was Du anspielst. Nach wie vor steht aber fest, dass kein Zucker der Welt eine ordentliche Dosis Aminosäuren ersetzen kann. Selbst große Mengen Zucker haben nur einen leichten antikatabolen Effekt (aber natürlich addieren sich die Effekte von Zucker + Protein).

--> http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/96/2/674

The principal finding was that intake of 100 g of carbohydrates after resistance exercise improved muscle net protein balance. However, this improvement was of questionable physiological significance because the net balance did not reach positive values and the improvement was minor compared with the reported effect of intake of amino acids.(...)
We conclude that intake of carbohydrates alone after resistance exercise will modestly improve the anabolic effect of exercise. However, amino acid intake is necessary for a maximal response.
Dagegen haben schon geringe Mengen Aminosäuren einen gewaltigen Effekt: --> http://ajpendo.physiology.org/cgi/co...ull/283/4/E648
The principal finding of this study was that ingestion of a relatively small amount (6 g) of EAA effectively stimulated net muscle protein balance after resistance exercise. The response of net muscle protein balance could be explained largely by a change in synthesis, as the rate of breakdown was not significantly affected. (...)
The results of the current study indicate that ~3.5 ± 1.1 g of muscle protein were synthesized during the 3 h after the first drink in one leg, or 7.0 ± 2.0 g in both legs, on the basis of irreversible loss of phenylalanine and the composition of muscle protein. This represents ~27% of ingested EAAs, because each gram of muscle protein synthesized includes both EAAs and NEAAs. When account of the water content of muscle (~73%) is taken, this would represent a net gain of ~26 g of muscle tissue synthesized in response to the drinks.